🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". The policy may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," commented one MEP driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is primarily happening at the local government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra use requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills mandating guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, other nations are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this global discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that governments globally are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.